Is Performance Management the answer?

February 26, 2010

This question was recently addressed on LinkedIn.  Here’s how I answered it…

Performance Management is necessary when you have the wrong people in the wrong job. If companies continue to use a job description and continue to interview to validate resumes they will never know who they really hire. The wrong fit always creates performance issues.

A better way is to first truly understand the job. This means digging into the Key Performance Indicators, developing the kinds of performance behaviors that will be successful, and then Benchmarking the top people in the job. This information is then coupled with a solid performance and behavioral based interviewing process to match the person to the job. When you have a good match you don’t need to “manage” performance, you just need to let the employee do what they do best.
How would you answer this question?  You can see other answers at this link: http://www.linkedin.com/answers/management/organizational-development/MGM_ODV/637145-6126809


Do you have a Hiring Combine?

February 24, 2010

Do you have a Hiring Combine?

“Speed, strength, and the inability to register pain immediately.”  ~Reggie Williams, when asked his greatest strengths as a football player

Each year the NFL hosts its annual combine.  It is the annual job fair for prospective new NFL players.  For six days, players are put through a series of drills, tests and interviews with more than 600 NFL staff including head coaches, general managers and scouts.  These coaches and scouts assess every aspect of athletic performance.  They measure the hopefuls in strength, speed, aptitude, and position specific skills.  Teams will make multi-million dollar investments and they want to know what they are getting.  There is more at stake than just winning games. Superstar players drive team licensing, merchandising, and advertising revenue.  Management doesn’t make players into household names out of the goodness of their hearts.  This is an important business decision. If not assessed correctly the first time,  it could become extremely costly.

What would you think of an NFL team if they had a short telephone interview with the young player, making up the “probing” questions a few minutes before the call?  Maybe, on the basis of that call, they will “like” the athlete and fly him in to visit them at the team offices.   Suppose the player meets with the coach and a few assistant coaches.  But since everyone is so busy they have the towel boy to take him to lunch and then on to the airport afterwards.  The next day a few of the coaches swap some email comments about the player  or maybe stop in the hall to ask the highly inquisitive question “What did you think of so and so?”  Based on this exhaustive process, the coach calls the player, makes a multi-year, multi-million dollar offer and the player accepts.  Later they are astonished to see the player fail. I wonder why the NFL doesn’t do it this way.

You wouldn’t think much of an NFL team who hired players like that.  Yet companies make multi-million dollar hiring decisions every day in just the same way.  Maybe if companies approach hiring top talent with the same rigor as the NFL they’d find more “superstars” – and profits.


The Personal 360 Degree Feedback

February 17, 2010

Everyone wants to know how they are doing at work. We have performance appraisals, goals, incentives, etc… all to help us keep score.  But often these measures don’t tell us the real story.  As a corporate leader you might excel in your business goals, but have a failing grade in your long-term strategy.  This could be especially true if your long-term strategy does not include upgrading and topgrading your team.  Here is a quick “360” checklist to assess how you‘re doing:

  1. Have you profiled the key jobs in your company or department?
  2. Do you truly understand the success metrics of each job?
  3. Have you benchmarked your key jobs against your best performers?
  4. Have you stopped asking interviewing questions based on a person’s resume?
  5. Have you implemented independent, third-party assessment tools?
  6. Would you classify all the potential candidates you’ve interviewed as ‘top talent’?
  7. Have you identified and started to develop your replacement?
  8. Are you spending time each week on a retention strategy?
  9. Does your on-boarding for new hires last throughout their entire first year?
  10. Have you integrated your Millennial generation hires into cross-generational teams?

If you answered ‘No’ to any of these questions then you have some work to do.  Traditional management and hiring is gone, stop using those techniques today.  Nothing has more impact on your current and future profitability and competitive edge than your people.  Pick one ‘No’ question and spend the next six weeks getting it to a ‘Yes’.  It is that important.

“That which cost little is less valued.” Cervantes


Senate proposes extending ARRA’s Medicaid assistance

February 11, 2010

Although the expanse of health care reform may have been trimmed back, Medicaid expansion is still a centerpiece and likely to be included in any final legislation.  Medicaid Managed Care organization’s will have a tremendous financial, logistic, and staffing issues to resolve when the wave of Medicaid enrollments start.  With government, market, and public relations pressuring MCO margins, companies need to start today preparing their most valuable resource – their professional talent.

Here are specific steps Medicaid MCOs need to do now:

  1. Listen to our recent webinar about this topic at your next management meeting.  You can access a recording on our website by clicking here.
  2. Identify the key positions in your care management department that will shelter you from this storm.
  3. Assess your Talent Equity against benchmarks.
  4. Contrast your readiness against company goals and objectives for 2010.
  5. Fill or upgrade the positions where you have gaps.

These steps will allow MCOs to place their human capital into the right roles for the right reasons.  Companies will see increased productivity, avoid burn-out, and surge ahead of their competition.

Let us know if we can help facilitate these steps in the process.

Heres a link to the article from Healthcare Finance News


It’s not about where they’ve been; it’s about where they can take you!

February 10, 2010

The resume looked great!  They’d had all the right titles.  Their responsibilities were in line with your job description.  Education (Masters “preferred”) – CHECK.  Correct number of years of experience – CHECK.  Willing to relocate – CHECK.  The resume was even printed on fine, light beige, linen paper.  Obviously a seasoned professional who had all the qualities you were looking for.  The phone screen went well, they met some of your colleagues, HR did the background check (no problems), and you liked the person.  Amazingly, six months into the job things weren’t going well.  They just didn’t click with your style or the company culture.  Their performance was not measuring up to your expectations.  You tried all the performance improvement tricks you knew.  This was starting to cost you time, money, and reputation.  After all, you made the decision to hire them.

As time wore on you realized they had to go.  Alas, more job requisition paperwork from HR and time to give it another try.

Unfortunately this scenario plays itself out over and over at almost every company.  Millions of hard and soft dollars are lost on these kinds of mis-hires.  And don’t forget the lost productivity of the hiring team, lost revenue opportunities, lost operating efficiencies, lower morale, and decreased creative energy.  These dollars have a direct impact on the bottom line. They also have a huge impact on competitive edge.  Plus, it will get harder and harder to find replacement employees as the pool of qualified professional talent continues to shrink.  Guess what – it doesn’t have to be this way!

Resume hiring and traditional interviewing only tells you where a person has been.  You want to know where they are going to take you.  Here are five simple steps you can implement today.  Following these steps will tell you if the next person will move your company forward;

  • First, profile the key positions that will drive your profits and competitive edge.
  • Second, benchmark the top performers in these key positions.  This tells you exactly what the next hire has to look like.
  • Third, STOP interviewing from the resume and start asking questions developed in the profiling and benchmarking process.  Demand that everyone in the interviewing team use this consistent set of questions.
  • Fourth, have a third party independently assess anyone you are considering for a key position.
  • Fifth, interview for the behaviors the person needs to be successful in the job.

In a hyper-competitive market with a diminishing talent pool, companies can’t afford traditional, job description hiring.  When you implement these five steps you’ll find the right top talent to take your company to the next level.


Motivating Employees in a Down Economy

February 8, 2010

There are several principles that managers can employ to keep employees motivated during a downturn.

First, communicate twice as much as you normally would.  There is a lot of anxiety, rumor, gossip, and stress among employees.  They need to be kept informed about company performance, progress toward goals, and about their own performance.  Keep the dialog open, informal, and frequent.

Second, make sure each employee knows how their contribution impacts the bottom line.  Help them understand that what they do matters.  Show them that doing better benefits the entire organization and  makes the entire company successful.

Third, be sure managers understand the ‘WIIFM’ principle.  Employees will only be motivated for their reasons, not management’s.  Corporate leaders must know what their employees work for, what inspires them, and why they come back everyday.  It will be different for each of the four generations working in your company, but it must appeal to them individually.

If you start with just an informal, conversational survey of your employee’s motivations, you’ll be off to a good start.


Read The Best Answer…

February 3, 2010

An appreciative “Thank you” to Vincent Vanderbent for recognizing my answer as being  the best in response to his LinkedIn question

“Employee retention: why do you keep inefficient managers and staff?”

It is a great question and the answer has eluded countless organizations.  You can read the full question and my answer at the following link:

http://www.linkedin.com/answers/management/labor-relations/MGM_LBR/625840-23470066


How To Do More With Less

February 3, 2010

Few companies have taken notice of what’s happening today in their workforce.  According to the Department of  Labor,  one Baby Boomer retires every eight seconds. That means that during one thirty-second Super Bowl commercial three senior sales people have left a company, or three CEOs have moved on, or three icons of corporate knowledge have moved to Florida, or three … well you get the picture.  Never before has so much talent exited the workforce at such a rapid pace.  The  Department of Labor also predicts this will accelerate over the next ten to fifteen years.  This depletion of talent, however, is not the biggest problem companies’ face.  There is a much bigger challenge ahead and very, very few have any attack strategy.

Does your company  understand there are 15% few workers in the generation behind the Boomers – Generation X?  There will be fewer people to fill the Boomer’s shoes.   This creates two levels of challenges for organizations; 1) Attracting the right people, and 2) sustaining high, cost effective productivity with fewer workers.  While technology, efficiency, and process changes will help, quality and job “fitness” of the right people will have the most impact on profits and competitive edge.   The need to do more with less simply becomes an overriding business priority.

Doing more with less starts to happen when company leaders understand which jobs drive profitability and competitiveness.  It is impossible to create an effective strategy unless companies know who is going to implement the strategy.  They should start by profiling the key positions.  Scrap the old job descriptions.  They don’t describe the position’s success metrics.   When there are fewer people companies have to know who they are hiring before they hire.  Companies need to know their real needs.  It is too expensive to hire a person you know nothing about for a job you don’t really understand.  Nail it down today.

Winston Churchill said, “I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat.”  Although very inspirational, few leaders today believe that is all it will take to maintain profitability and competitive edge.  Start by understanding who the company really needs and what the person needs to do to be successful.  This is how companies get the right person in the right job at the right time.  This is how they can do more, a lot more, with less.


Raising the retirement age?

February 2, 2010

There was a recent discussion on Fox Business about raising the retirement age and the impact it might have on business.  (Here’s the link – http://tinyurl.com/yetvhqr) What wasn’t included in the discussion was the impact on Corporate Knowledge. Corporate knowledge means profitability and beating the competition. But with so many Boomers retiring over the next 10 years,  companies run the risk of a significant drain on this valuable resource.    One solution – CONTRACTING!

When Boomers retire it creates a huge talent vacuum in the workforce.  And although Boomers will retire, they don’t want to stop working entirely.  In actuality, according to many studies, only a small percentage of Boomers (less than 20%) hope to never work again and a certain percentage even envisions the need to work full-time.  So that opens the doors for part-time work and/or cycles of work and leisure.  Companies can still access their corporate knowledge and skills through consulting relationships and contract projects.

This is also attractive to Boomers in that many are limited in their ability to relocate and are pressured to provide for their children or elderly parents.  Some other important factors include the following:

1. Money—The ability to financially supplement a retirement plan or Social Security income is an important factor.  Contractors are paid for every hour they work, and they are often paid at a very acceptable rate because of their experience and knowledge.

2. Flexibility—Flexibility is critical to these Baby Boomers, and contract staffing offers that option.  They can set their own schedules, work as many or as few hours as they like, take the summer off or time at Christmas, arrange for job sharing, etc.  The decision can be made based upon their own unique situations at home.

3. Health Care—Another consideration is health insurance.  Although Boomers are healthier than they used to be, certain chronic conditions become more common and usually grow worse with age.  And we all know that Americans are living longer than they used to.

What do companies say?
Studies show that older employees tend to be more loyal, detail-oriented, and reliable than younger people.  In many cases, Baby Boomers provide a competitive edge because they already have a required skill or knowledge base to handle a specific task or project.  Many companies actually try to recruit Boomers and retirees back into the workforce.  They have the experience and expertise the client needs, plus if he/she is a retiree, they’re familiar with the company’s operation guidelines, internal procedures, etc.

Contract staffing is an excellent alternative for both the Boomers and companies.


5 Tips to Find Top Talent in a Flooded Resume Market

January 28, 2010

The current economy has driven many job seekers to desperation.  They are applying to almost anything and everything.  Employers are inundated with resumes, many from unqualified people.  Wading through all the applicants can be costly and time consuming for any company.  The downside to this activity  is expending precious time and energy on unproductive efforts.  The upside to this, however, is finding a jewel that a company can’t afford to through out!  Since human capital is a company’s most important resource, Strategic Employers are compelled to do everything possible to surface, attract, hire and retain top talent.  So what, and how,  do you look for a needle in a resume haystack?

Here are five strategic tips to guide any team as they consider which resume to keep and which to discard:

1) First benchmark the key positions in the company that  drive profits and give the company a competitive edge.  These are the positions in which you MUST have the top talent.  Then build a unique list of keywords for these positions and search the resume flood for only those that contain these keywords.

2)  Look for a  unique combination of skills/experience (for example, the actuary who has proven business development skills).  Zero in on someone with  a skill/experience background that is not normally found in the “typical” candidate.

3) People who have assumed progressive levels of responsibility at the SAME COMPANY should be moved to the top.

4)  Discard any resumes that only list job tasks and responsibilities.  Focus on the person who bullet-points  tangible, quantifiable results achieved in difficult situations.

5)  Outsource this entire resume sorting process to a firm who knows the top talent in your industry and who can quickly weed out resumes that don’t match.  They can then deliver only the best for a company to work with.

Screening resumes for top talent is not the core skill of many companies or most HR departments.  Every company needs top talent and top talent will be much harder to find in the coming year.  Unemployment isn’t going to turn around overnight.   Strategic Employers are putting plans in place today to be sure they find, attract, hire, and retain only the best in their industry.  Use these five tips to start moving the best to the top of the list.